Stettin N.T., Braunsfelde. Dated Sept. 4, 1912 - Thanks him for 'Adonis, Attis, Osiris'; is happy his notes have been of service; the burning of kings in 'Adonis' is interesting; has a statuette that might be an Attis; believes Frazer is right in the main about [Peter?] Jensen, and thinks he is right to detach his Crucifixion theory, but he is inclined to look for the nucleus of possibilities in the 'wild and unmethodical ways', hopes he can find an opportunity of inserting a reference to his 'Israel'; many people are interested in translating 'Israel', including Sir William Ramsay and his daughter in Boston. Accompanied by four pages of notes in German, possibly those referred to in the letter of 11.8.12.
Pembroke College, Cambridge. Dated May 23, 1901 - Weil [recte R. A. Neil] sent on Frazer's question; while he does not do comparative grammar, he thinks the derivation of Naman from Ameretat is wrong; went to see [Anthony Ashley] Bevan and he referred him to the 'Encyclopaedia Biblica' that says Naman is Numman; distrusts [H.] Winckler, and thinks [F. C.] Andreas 'is capable of turning out a bad book in the realm of later Persian history'; suggests he try Prof. Cowell.
Trinity College WW thinks RJ is right in resolving to explain himself further: 'If you want to see how it may be needed read the enclosed letter of Pryme [George Pryme] which I have just got and which I treacherously communicate to you the object of his criticisms. You will perceive how deeply the notion is burnt into these people that Ricardo's theory is good because he analyses the circumstances. The young Londoners have got the same fancy - most of the rest of Pryme's critique is stupid enough'. WW is to be one of the council of the Royal Society: 'My main reason for not refusing this is my dislike to be coupled with the Babbagian sect of spewers or railers; for in truth I do not see much chance of good coming of it'. Concerning Ricardo's analysis of rent, 'cannot it be shewn that it impossible to discriminate between the payment for the original powers of the soil, and for improvements?'
26 Pall Mall. - Regrets that he was unable to attend last night. Postscript: railroad committee now occupies him all day.
Correspondence addressed to Margaret Taylor.
Esther Simpson was for many years Secretary of the Society for the Protection of Science and Learning, in which capacity Frisch first became acquainted with her. She also shared his love of music, often referred to in the letters.
Correspondence 1965-66 refers to the presentation fund on her retirement in 1966, correspondence 1978 refers to later presentation.
'How do proteins work?', Leeds Medical School, 13 May 1942.
'Recent progress in protein analysis', c 1942.
Visit of the Foreign Secretary of the Royal Society to Malaysia, 14–21 April 1989
Written from Fosdyke, Spalding, Lincolnshire.
107 Barcombe Avenue, Streatham Hill, S.W.2 - Two letters seeking a chance to meet and get advice on research fellowships in the field of folklore. Asks him to attend a social at the London Folklore Club before Frazer's lecture at King's College, Strand.
Contents of Synge's envelope so inscribed divided into three for ease of reference:
A/119: 'Living Stuff', 6pp typescript of lecture by F.G. Hopkins; typescript and duplicated typescript notes on isolation of organic compounds
A/120-121: Manuscript and typescript notes on the literature, latest bibliographical reference 1932.