Showing 22 results

Archival description
HOUG/37/113 · Item · 7 Jan [1854s?]
Part of Papers of Richard Monckton Milnes, Lord Houghton

Bawtry. - Read Hayward's 'Radowitz' [obituary of the general, published in the Morning Chronicle, 31 Dec. 1853?]; apt description. of 'Peelite' views, combining pomposity and simplicity. His wife is much better. Coalition failing, much as expected, possibly because of [Sir James] Graham's presence; did he write 'F-----' article in the Times?

Add. MS a/77/156 · Item · 15 Apr. 1850
Part of Additional Manuscripts a

Herstmonceux - JCH is extremely pleased that WW is so pleased with his letter to Cavendish [A Letter to the Hon. R. Cavendish, on the recent Judgement of the Court of Appeal in Affirming the Doctrine of the Church, 1850]: 'The question as to the force of the judgement does seem to me so clear; yet so many persons, otherwise intelligent & clearheaded, are utterly in the dark about it'. The Bishop of London's conduct throughout this episode seems to have been weak. The Address WW sent him needs to be modified in the manner JCH recommended. It would otherwise 'do more harm than good, & wd be regarded as little more than an expression of latitudinarian philosophical indifference. Therefore, even though it were restricted to the laity, I wd strongly urge the desirableness of giving it a more definite Christian tone'. When WW sees Sir James [Sir James Graham], will he 'thank him in my name for his beautiful, but exaggerated mention of the Guesses [Guesses at Truth, by Two Brothers, 1827]. I shall have to say something of him when I reprint the Vindication of Luther. We have been reading over the Arlutes in his first volume with exceeding interest and pleasure, and wonder that a man with such a mass of occupations, the burthen of our whole Colonial Empire, on his shoulders, shd have found time & powers of thought to become so familiar with so many of the great characters in the history of the church'. JCH had a letter from Mrs Twining (Mary Arnold) in response to some inquiries to Wordsworth prompted by WW's letter: 'The dear old poet was supposed to be dying on Sunday the 7th, his eightieth birthday; but had rallied somewhat since. His illness has revived his sister's love for him. Mrs Wordsworth hoped that he might be called away rather than restored, if his restoration were only to be a state like poor Southey's [Robert Southey]. Her love for him is truly heroic: I hope that, whatever may be the immediate issue, their separation will be but short. How much love & thankfulness from thousands of hearts that he has enlightened & purified, will rise with his departing spirit to heaven'.

O./15.45/1/68 · Part · 28 Jan. 1843
Part of Manuscripts in Wren Class O

Trin: Lodge - Confirming that the College abstained in changing the 41st statute as it applies to the University at large as well as to the College. Whewell has conferred with the committee of the Heads concerned with revising the University statutes and hopes to send him a draft of this statute revised. Sir Nicholas Tindal claims that it is not 'subject to the same interpreting authority as the University statutes...but is a College statute' and up to the Master and seniors of the College to revise it. Whewell will send him former royal letters which have modified College Statutes to show how they 'have obtained their validity'.